Research
Publications
“Reform and Community Level Participation: The Overturn of SQF in New York City” Urban Affairs Review (2024) https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874241241266
Abstract
Though there has been a wealth of work showing that negative experiences with government lead to less political participation, there is little understanding of how to address this problem. That is, it is unclear whether reform to negative government behavior can also address the negative consequences of that behavior. This paper uses the overturn of Stop, Question, and Frisk in New York City to show that despite a significant change to police behavior, having experienced a high level of policing continues to depress voter turnout. Furthermore, it uses residents who have moved within New York City after the change in policy to show that residing in a community that was heavily policed continues to influence voter behavior, even if an individual never directly experienced high levels of policing. This is in line with communities both being changed by police policies and community transmission of norms around participation.
“Large Language Models Can Argue in Convincing and Novel Ways About Politics” Political Science (2024) https://doi.org/10.1080/00323187.2024.2335471 With Arthur Spirling. Github
Abstract
All politics relies on rhetorical appeals, and the ability to make arguments is considered perhaps uniquely human. But as recent times have seen successful large language model (LLM) applications to similar endeavours, we explore whether these approaches can out-compete humans in making appeals for/against various positions in US politics. We curate responses from crowdsourced workers and an LLM and place them in competition with one another. Human (crowd) judges make decisions about the relative strength of their (human v machine) efforts. We have several empirical ‘possibility’ results. First, LLMs can produce novel arguments that convince independent judges at least on a par with human efforts. Yet when informed about an orator’s true identity, judges show a preference for human over LLM arguments. This may suggest voters view such models as potentially dangerous; we think politicians should be aware of related ‘liar’s dividend’ concerns.
Working Papers
“The Effectiveness of Narrative Structure at Building Public Support”
Abstract
As many countries note declining trust in government institutions, the academic and public discussion has largely focused on the connection between trust and government performance. However, many governments and institutions use other strategies to build trust, including storytelling. Rather than improving government performance or procedures, telling a story (following a rising action-climax-falling action format) can increase empathy towards government representatives and a more positive a ect towards institutions. I use the case of the main investigative police service in Kenya, the Directorate of Criminal Investigations, which has been sharing stories of their cases on Twitter as a way to build trust in the police. Using sentiment classi cation, I show that people who follow these stories (rather than straightforward reports of similar police actions) write more positively about the police. I also use data from a survey experiment in Kenya to demonstrate that structuring information as a story increases audience belief that the relevant actors can be trusted. Finally, I compare the e ects of a story with elements of procedural justice to establish this strategy is at least as e ective as shifting opinions about performance at building trust. This project contributes to our understanding of how trust develops and the e ect of structure as compared to content.
“Why Are Citizens So Cynical? And About What?” With Gwyneth McClendon
Abstract
Observers have remarked that cynicism about politics—the belief that political actors have bad intentions and act in bad faith—is currently very high around the world. Is this cynicism mostly about political elites, or also about a wider range of actors? What are some of the drivers of political cynicism, and what are some of its consequences? Using original survey data from the United States (with planned data collection in Kenya), we argue that there are at least two dimensions of politically-relevant cynicism that should be parsed: (1) cynicism about human nature generally and (2) cynicism specifically about political elites. These two dimensions are conceptually distinct from each other: human nature cynicism views all people as badly intentioned, whereas elite cynicism allows that most people are well-intentioned but does not see this goodness manifested in current elite circles. These two dimensions of cynicism have divergent consequences. Individuals who are highly cynical about human nature are less motivated to participate in politics, are more tolerant of leaders’ bad behavior, even willing to support leaders who strategically lie and cheat in order to get things done, and are not particularly keen to support leaders who diverge from existing elite norms. By contrast, individuals who are highly cynical about elites but not so cynical about human nature tend to be highly motivated to participate in politics, express outrage about current elites’ lying and cheating behavior, and look for explicit signals that the candidates they support are fundamentally different from current elites. We also hypothesize that these two types of cynicism have different drivers. Using survey experiments, we find that perceiving that the current government is against your in-group increases elite cynicism; by contrast, perceiving that governments (not just the current one) have for a long time been against your in-group, increases human nature cynicism. We discuss the implications for understanding contemporary politics.
“Books vs Bullets: Measuring Rebel-Provided Services”
Abstract
Despite the growing literature on rebel governance, the difficulty in obtaining reliable data during active conflicts has limited our understanding of internal variation in governance and service provision. This paper uses a within household cohort design drawn from DHS reporting of educational attainment to look at service provision by the Fources Nouvelles in Cote d’Ivoire. This measure if validated by existing surveys on service provision. I test several existing theories around service provision which have contrasting predictions in the current literature, and show that the patterns of provision in this case on consistent with a group focused on building long term, inclusive civilian support rather than short term resource gathering.
Works in Progress
“How to Use Masked Language Models to Classify Narrative Structure in Political Texts”
Abstract
This paper develops an original method for classifying the latent structure of a piece of text using a Masked Language Model to classify the similarity of component parts and then scoring documents by the overall ordering of each category. Though there is a wealth of work categorizing text based on its topic and tone, there is little methodology for sorting text by the way it is structured. This is despite the fact that anyone who speaks or writes thinks carefully about the best order in which to convey information and the subsequent impact on an audience. For instance, relating information as a story rather than in a straightforward man ner has been shown to be more persuasive and increase empathy. However, in contexts where time is limited or an audience is more skeptical, it may be best to lead with the main point. Being able to classify the structure of text will allow us to both understand how politicians convey information and the contexts in which this varies. The benefits of the method include that it can be used on short form documents, which are often more difficult to break into discrete parts, and each stage can be verified by an analyst rather than black-boxing what is being classified.
“Beyond Human Judgment: Evaluating Language Model Uncertainty for Social Science Research.” with Arthur Spirling and Christopher Barrie
Other Publications
“Using proprietary language models in academic research requires explicit justification.” Natural Computational Science (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-023-00585-1 With Arthur Spirling and Noah Smith.